God and Gays
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sarah-kate-ellis/god-v-gays-is-a-false-narrative_b_7769362.html
It is difficult to address the subject of gay marriage nowadays
without being called either bigot or stereotyping person depending on your
argument orientation. Many religious communities
feel like they have been assaulted and insulted by the Supreme Court ruling
legalizing same-sex marriage in the United States because most find the ruling
goes against their moral values and religious belief. Since religious
institutions are tax-exempt, they fear some of their decisions or actions
toward gays who choose to attend their church may be subject to legal challenges
in court. For example, a church practicing “open-door” refuses to allow a gay
charitable event in the church premises could face some accusation of
discrimination that may lead to cancelation
of tax-exempt status. The laws established by men are always subject to
different interpretations often based upon self-motivated and political
interest. Consequently, there is no guaranty,
the Supreme Court will allude to the first amendment “ Freedom of Religion” to uphold the church’s reason and practice as
being “ the free exercise” as stipulated in the constitution; “Congress shall
make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
exercises thereof”. How will the
Supreme Court define and describe “free exercises”? Churches’ exercises or
activities are performed according to their moral values and belief system I am
curious to know the definition or description of such exercise. While every
church should welcome everybody, no one should condemn the church’s preaching
because the teaching is rooted in its
religious doctrine. For example, the church may call out certain behavior or
character as being wrong, evil or sin according to their moral values and moral
laws. Christians could defend their stand against gay marriage by the evoking biblical verses that not only mention the existence of such practice in the
past but also the condemnation of such behavior. Christians often say “Love
the sinner, but hate the sin.” In the West, virtue ethics originates from moral laws revealed by an
absolute God. God has revealed not only who human
ought to be (virtue), but also how human shall behave (character) by giving them moral
laws that can be consolidated in one line, “the Golden Rule”. There is a strong
need for a point of reference, from an absolute
being that encompasses universal moral values. Without
such perfect character to whom we all can look like in the mirror, we will be
inclined to develop moral and
ethics values that make us become more and more relativist. Someone stated, “Sexual
orientation is who you go to bed with, and sexual identity is who you go to bed
as.” While choice can be made about the orientation,
the author believes we did not choose our identity at birth. If someone’s judgement
of my personal ethics is based on his or her personal belief system and value,
I should also have the right to judge he or she according to my personal belief
system and moral values.
Comments